“It works on my branch.” – Every Developer Ever 😅

Let’s talk about something that can either streamline your dev flow or cause headaches big enough to consider switching careers: Git branching models.

One of the common issues in many teams is how developers handle their feature branches. Developers often create a branch and continue coding on it for several days—sometimes even weeks. Meanwhile, the main or dev branch continues to get updated with other developers’ changes. By the time the feature branch is ready to merge, it’s outdated, and developers face painful merge conflicts.

These conflicts slow things down, introduce stress, and worse—bad merge decisions can break the codebase or cause hidden bugs that take time to detect. To avoid this, the golden rule is simple: Always keep your feature branches short-lived.

🚧 The Problem: Long-Lived Branches = Long-Lived Pain

Imagine this: You start working on a feature in your branch. You’re deep in the zone, days pass, commits pile up. Meanwhile, other devs are also pushing to the main or dev branch.

You finally feel done and open a PR. Boom 💥
Merge conflicts everywhere.

Now you’re spending hours manually resolving conflicts, re-running tests, and praying nothing silently breaks.

And here’s the thing — if those conflicts involve database migrations, you’re in for double trouble. Your migration might be based on an outdated schema, and merging it without rebasing could cause:

• Duplicate or skipped migrations
• Broken schemas
• Data loss (!!)

It’s like defusing a bomb with spaghetti code wrapped around it 🍝💣

---

🧨 Real Talk on DB Migrations

Database migrations should always run on top of the latest revision. It’s your job as a developer to:

1. Pull the latest code from main
2. Run the newest migrations
3. Add yours on top
4. Test it thoroughly

“Databases never forget… but they can erase.” – A Dev After Losing Prod Data 😬

Wrong migrations can silently wreak havoc — not just to structure, but also to real data. Always be careful.

🛠️ Git Branching Models: Which One Works?

There are two main camps in the Git universe:

🔵 Branch-Based Repository (Classic)

You branch out, work independently, merge when ready. Simple, but…

• Encourages long-lived branches (aka conflict central)
• Delays integration
• Developers can go “off the grid”

🔴 Trunk-Based Repository (Modern)

You work in short-lived branches (or directly on main), integrate frequently, and deploy often.

“Merge early, merge often.” – Trunk Devs, probably

This model encourages:

• Continuous integration
• Better collaboration
• Fewer surprises at merge time

But it’s not for the faint of heart — you need automated tests, discipline, and the courage to push code that might hit production faster than you expected.

🚀 Why I Prefer Trunk-Based (and You Might Too)

Short-lived feature branches with frequent merges into the main branch allow:

• Faster delivery
• Fewer conflicts
• Better team visibility
• Reduced isolation

Yes, it feels risky. But here’s the twist:
You’re already merging to main anyway. Why not do it earlier and with less confusion?

You might think: But what if we break something?

And that’s a fair concern. But let’s be honest—how often do we really do full regression testing after merging a feature branch? Most teams skip it due to time constraints.

Trunk-based development forces you to stay clean, test-ready, and merge-friendly.

🧑‍🔧 Hotfixes, Releases & Tags: When Branching Makes Sense

Now, this doesn’t mean you throw branching out the window. Some scenarios still need it:

🛠️ Hotfixes

Fix a bug on production? Create a quick branch, patch it, test, and merge back to main.

📦 Releases

Each major release should have its own release branch like rel-2.0, rel-3.1, etc.

Tag the release (v3.1.0), write a proper release note, and share it with the team and client. That note becomes a historical reference, reducing confusion and helping future debugging.

“Documentation is like vegetables — nobody likes it, but it keeps your project healthy.” 🥦

---

🧪 Want to Merge Fearlessly? You Need Tests.

You can’t confidently ship to main daily without a safety net.

Here’s your toolkit:

• ✅ Unit Tests – Test your logic. Time-consuming, but solid.
• ✅ Integration Tests – Connect the dots. More useful in most business apps.
• ✅ UI Automation – Use Cypress, Selenium, Playwright, etc.
• ✅ CI/CD Pipelines – Let GitHub Actions or Azure DevOps do the heavy lifting.

Having automated tests means you’re not relying on gut feeling before merging — you have data.

🚨 Final Thoughts: Don’t Let Git Block Your Speed

Your Git model should boost velocity, not become a bottleneck.

If you’re scared of merging, deploying, or breaking things — it’s a sign of:

• Incomplete testing
• Poor communication
• Long-lived branches

But if you’ve got a well-automated pipeline and test coverage, deploying multiple times a week should feel normal.

“Move fast and fix things — with tests.” – Updated Dev Mantra 🚀

TL;DR:

• Avoid long-lived branches. Merge often.
• Rebase and align your DB migrations.
• Prefer Trunk-Based Dev for faster, cleaner workflows.
• Always tag releases and write release notes.
• Automate tests to build confidence.
• Your branching model shouldn’t be a blocker to shipping great software.

---

Coming next: Zero Confusion Policy: Part 6 – Writing Tests That Actually Matter

(Yes, we’ll talk about mocking, test coverage, and when it’s okay to skip a unit test 😅)